Skip to main content

News

12,736 articles from 50+ sources

news.google.com Pro-Iran
How the Iran war exposed cracks in Trump's Republican coalition - BBC

How the Iran war exposed cracks in Trump's Republican coalition  BBC

The Independent Pro-Iran
UK bishop who left Iran after revolution says ‘barbaric’ regime ‘is in its death throes’

The Bishop of Chelmsford also praised Starmer for his stance on the Middle East crisis

Al Jazeera Pro-Iran
Iran war live: US bombs Iran’s Kharg Island, warns oil facilities next

Intense strikes target central Tehran as US president says 'powerful' bombing raid hit Iranian forces on Kharg Island.

Middle East Eye Pro-Iran
US bombs Iran’s Kharg Island

US bombs Iran’s Kharg Island The US has bombed military installations on Iran’s Kharg Island, close to the Strait of Hormuz, US President Donald Trump has announced.  “The United States Central Command executed one of the most powerful bombing raids in the History of the Middle East, and totally obliterated every MILITARY target in Iran’s crown jewel, Kharg Island,” Trump said in a Truth Social post. "For reasons of decency, I have chosen NOT to wipe out the Oil Infrastructure on the Island," Trump added.

reddit.com Pro-Iran
Israel’s Deadly Blockade Traps 7 U.S. Doctors in Gaza

submitted by /u/Alternative-Day-7414 to r/MiddleEastNews [link] [comments]

news.google.com Pro-Iran
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Keeps Getting Worse - New York Magazine

The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Keeps Getting Worse  New York Magazine

reddit.com Pro-Iran
US attacks Iran's Kharg Island, Trump says

submitted by /u/joe4942 to r/worldnews [link] [comments]

reddit.com Pro-Iran
Israel drops leaflets in Beirut, threatening Gaza-style devastation after destroying a bridge.

submitted by /u/OverInteractionR to r/worldnews [link] [comments]

news.google.com Pro-Iran
Under the Iron Dome: Iranian strikes pierce Israel's missile shield - Reuters

Under the Iron Dome: Iranian strikes pierce Israel's missile shield  Reuters

news.google.com Pro-Iran
Is Australia at war with Iran? The fine line between ‘defensive operations’ and complicity - The Guardian

Is Australia at war with Iran? The fine line between ‘defensive operations’ and complicity  The Guardian

news.google.com Pro-Iran
Brooks and Capehart on Trump's mixed signals on the Iran war - PBS

Brooks and Capehart on Trump's mixed signals on the Iran war  PBS

Middle East Eye Pro-Iran
Six killed by Israeli missile attack in central Iranian village

Six killed by Israeli missile attack in central Iranian village Six people have been killed in an Israeli missile attack on a village in the central Markazi province, Iran’s Fars news agency is reporting.  Seven people were also injured in the attack, Fars reported.

Middle East Eye Pro-Iran
Israeli strike on south Lebanon health centre kills 12 medics

Israeli strike on south Lebanon health centre kills 12 medics An Israeli strike on a health centre in southern Lebanon has killed 12 medical workers, the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health reported.

news.google.com Pro-Iran
Vladimir Putin enjoys a huge windfall from the Iran war - The Economist

Vladimir Putin enjoys a huge windfall from the Iran war  The Economist

The Independent Pro-Iran
How Michigan, Virginia and New York attacks reveal elevated US terror threat amid Iran war

Three acts of ideologically inspired violence in the last week have laid bare the heightened terrorism threat in the United States – is the country equipped to deal with it?

Middle East Eye Pro-Iran
'Suez moment': US missteps in Iran echo across East Asia to the Gulf and Europe

'Suez moment': US missteps in Iran echo across East Asia to the Gulf and Europe Sean Mathews on Fri, 03/13/2026 - 20:57 The US is taking from allies in the Gulf, Europe and Asia to wage an ill-defined war that has raised questions of 'competence,' experts say The Royal Thai Navy shows smoke rising from the Thai bulk carrier 'Mayuree Naree' near the Strait of Hormuz after an attack(Handout/Royal Thai Navy/AFP) Off US air defence systems and troops have been withdrawn from East Asia. Pleas for missile interceptors in the oil-rich Gulf have been "stonewalled". Even an air base in Romania has been roped into the US-Israeli war on Iran. What US President Donald Trump has characterised as a “little excursion” is fast becoming the biggest drain on the security architecture of the world’s foremost superpower since the end of the Cold War. The US is taking a lot from its partners across the globe to wage war on the Islamic Republic, even as lawmakers and world leaders question what the purpose of the conflict is. To make matters worse, the Trump administration has yet to provide answers to tactical questions about how it will break Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz or tame energy prices that have skyrocketed as a result. “The problem the US will need to recover from is the loss of credibility as it opened a Pandora’s box without thinking through what would happen next. Lack of competence is a terrible thing to display in public,” Peter Frankopan, a professor of global history at Oxford University, told Middle East Eye. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Now in its third week, the US-Israel war has shown that Iran can be pummelled from afar. The 86-year-old supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in the war’s opening salvo. The US boasted on Friday that it has hit a staggering 6,000 targets in Iran. But the takeover of government institutions by ordinary Iranians that Trump has called for has yet to materialise, and Khamenei's son, Mojtaba, has been named as the next supreme leader. The US was even rebuffed by Kurdish partners, whom it hoped would rise up in rebellion. There is no sign pointing to the Iranian government's collapse. 'Lack of competence is a terrible thing to display in public' - Peter Frankopan, Oxford University Instead, on Friday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and top security official Ali Larijani felt confident enough to stroll downtown Tehran among thousands of people even as Israeli air strikes targeted the area. Iran’s ability to torment Doha, Manama and Dubai with cheap Shahed drones continues as expensive American missile interceptors are exhausted. An Iranian strike rocked Tel Aviv on Friday. Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world’s energy passes, was aflame this week with at least six vessels attacked by Iran. All of these tactical strikes have been carried out by a country currently under relentless air strikes, and which has also been under crippling sanctions by the US for four decades. “I think we are witnessing a Suez Crisis moment for the US,” Fawaz Gerges, a professor of international relations and expert on the Middle East at the London School of Economics, told MEE. In 1956, Britain and France joined forces with Israel to attack Egypt after President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal. The US, under President Dwight D Eisenhower, smacked Israel and the European’s into submission. Suez has gone down in history as a textbook case of late imperial overreach. A picture released on 8 November 1956 shows British troops digging trenches, near Port Said, Egypt, during the Suez crisis (STR/Files/Intercontinentale/AFP) (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); But there are key differences between the war on Iran and the Suez crisis. Few predict that a battered Iran will emerge victorious from the war, offering an alternative security system to the US. According to Trump’s own admission, Russia is aiding Iranian attacks against the US. MEE was the first to reveal that China has sent air defence systems and offensive weapons to Tehran. An Arab official told MEE that further weapons supplies are continuing uninterrupted. But China and Russia are confined to spoilers in the region, experts say. “There is no superpower to replace the Americans, unlike how the French and British were sidelined,” Gerges said. One lesson to take from Suez, of course, is that even after they are embarrassed, imperial powers can endure for decades. Britain continued to meddle in Yemen and the Gulf for twenty years after Suez. The last British troops left the Trucial States - modern UAE - in 1971. Even today, the UK is helping the UAE shoot down Iranian drones and missiles.  Ships in Strait of Hormuz to be 'set ablaze', IRGC official says, as insurers cancel coverage Read More » The US’s climax in surpassing the old British Empire in the Middle East came after the 1991 Persian Gulf war, when US military bases sprang up in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar. Energy-rich Gulf states assumed those bases would give them security. Now, MEE has reported, some are questioning the value of hosting the US. The Gulf states are facing pressure from Washington to join the war on Iran, and have become targets because of their ties to the US. The Gulf states were already on guard over the US’s failure to respond to a 2019 Iranian attack on Saudi oil installations and, more recently, Washington’s inability to rein in Israel, which bombed Doha last year. In response, they started to hedge their bets. Saudi Arabia signed a mutual defence agreement with Pakistan and was exploring joint weapons production with Turkey. The UAE has hosted the Chinese military. “When the dust settles from this war, the diversification that was taking place will speed up,” Gerges said. Frankopan said it would take time for those attitudes to mature. “Across the Gulf, I am hearing lots of threats to turn to China and elsewhere for weapons systems, security and defence and even for investment more broadly. I think that reflects the heat and difficulties of the moment,” he said. “[But] the US is an enormous economy, with lots of highly innovative and exciting opportunities. That does not change overnight. But… in football terms, this looks like an own goal,” Gerges added. The crisis of confidence in US power is not just stirring in the Gulf. Missiles and troops out of East Asia The concept of reducing US entanglements in the Middle East to focus on rivalry with China has become so stale in Washington that it’s almost a platitude. But East Asian countries now have reason to be alarmed. The US has reportedly begun moving a Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence (Thaad) missile-defence system from South Korea to the Middle East. South’s foreign minister, Cho Hyun, said on Friday that the US was also weighing the redeployment of some US Patriot missile defence systems. This carries deep symbolic weight in South Korea, a key US ally and economic partner, Andrew Yeo, a senior fellow and the Korea chair at the Brookings Institution’s Center for East Asia Policy Studies, told MEE. A decade ago, China and South Korea got into a nasty spat over the deployment of the Thaad system. South Korea endured a Chinese economic boycott that cost it billions of dollars to defend its placement. “The mission of US forces there is to deter and defend against a North Korean invasion,” Yeo said. “If US forces are just going to go in and out, then what does that mean for the US commitment to South Korea’s defence? Those questions are being raised,” he said. On Friday, reporting emerged that the Pentagon is sending the USS Tripoli, a Marine amphibious ready group, and 2,500 US Marines from Japan to the Middle East. 'There is no superpower to replace the Americans, unlike how the French and British were sidelined' - Fawaz Gerges, London School of Economics “By some thinking, anything that keeps US forces outside the Indo-Pacific region is good for China,” Yeo said. Experts say that you can add European countries to the list of US partners bearing the price for the US-Israeli war on Iran. A Patriot air defence system had to be moved from Germany to defend a Nato radar base in Malatya, Turkey. Romanian President Nicusor Dan said on Wednesday that his country will host US refuelling planes, surveillance and satellite communications ‌gear. Greece has also deployed a Patriot missile system on an Aegean island. The military reshuffle occurs against the backdrop of Russia’s war on Ukraine. The Trump administration has long been in a tussle with European allies about the cost of supporting Ukraine. One of the key wins European leaders were able to chalk up was tougher sanctions on Russian oil. Now, in response to rising energy prices, the Trump administration is walking those sanctions back. Europe pays the price “In some ways, it’s Suez in reverse because you have a transatlantic crisis of different shared stakes and policies. Then it was Europe pursuing an assertive policy, and the US not liking it. Now, it's the opposite,” Ian Lesser, the vice president of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, told MEE. “Suez is a good example.” “Already most of Nato’s integrated air defence capacity is afloat in the Mediterranean,” added Lesser. European countries are deeply exposed to the closure of Hormuz. They pivoted to purchasing jet fuel and diesel from refineries in the Gulf after sanctioning Russia. Trump has shown little sympathy for their pain, bragging this week that the US - as a net energy exporter - benefited from the rising prices. “There is a fundamental question of what is the American stake in international stability: security and economic. It goes to the question of trust in the US,” Lesser said. “The very fact that there is a debate over whether ties with the US are an asset or liability is disturbing," he added.  For those looking for a sign that the US has already lost some prestige and power, one can look to the Strait of Hormuz. The power to guarantee the safe passage of sea lanes and the flow of trade is a hallmark of being a superpower. But with the US unable to open the strait, France and Italy are now reaching out to Iran to secure passage for tankers carrying energy, The Financial Times reported.  Reuters also reported that India has done the same. “It’s going to be a much more chaotic, multipolar world,” Gerges said. War on Iran News Post Date Override 0 Update Date Mon, 05/04/2020 - 21:19 Update Date Override 0

news.google.com Pro-Iran
The Iran war's looming economic threat: Higher food prices - NBC News

The Iran war's looming economic threat: Higher food prices  NBC News

Al-Monitor Pro-Iran
Pentagon limits info, clashes with press over Iran

The Pentagon's engagement with the media during the Iran war has been heavy on rhetoric, short on operational detail and characterized by an adversarial approach to mainstream outlets that seek to raise questions about the conflict. While journalists had access to detailed, often-daily briefings as well as embeds with troops during previous wars such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan, the US military has taken a markedly different approach to communicating during the Iran conflict.

reddit.com Pro-Iran
Zelenskiy says US sought postponement of talks on war settlement, Ukrainian media reports

submitted by /u/Raj_Valiant3011 to r/worldnews [link] [comments]